February 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28    

« Protest petition in action | Main | Obsoleted »

Nov 18, 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Fec

Not to mention a couple of political casualties in the bargain.

A. Bulluck

"Smelly from the get go, ripening as we go along...."

That made me a little nauseous.

mick

I am a supporter and I am somewhat in agreement.

mick

But just maybe we will ahve more of these stories going forward!


http://www.greensborosports.com/2009/11/18/southeast-guilford-grad-godsoe-making-greensboro-look-good/#comment-43820

David Wharton

Time for Hoggard to say "I told you so," I think.

Lex

Hoggard has spoken.

mick

I wish he was wrongerish. It has been a tough go.

Bill

They need to put this thing back in the box and return to sender. The cost-to-benefit ration is ridiculously high, as it would only serve the needs of a limited portion of the community. A swim meet is not like a ball game, where people go to drink beer and have a good time. The only people that go to these things swim or having swimming sprouts. I would love to see another facility here soley because I swim laps, but this really needs to be nipped in the bud.

bubba

"The cost-to-benefit ration is ridiculously high."

Sorry, Bill. You're not allowed to bring that sort of thing up when we're talking about bond issues.

Don't you know that the use of common sense, good judgment, and reputable fiduciary discipline in the use of public money have no merit when we're discussing something that's "for the children", or some other sound bite worthy cause?

The comments to this entry are closed.