A theory of what went wrong in the GPD/GSO showdown: "I think the Chief got fired for what happened and didn't happen at three key moments..."

Councilwoman Sandy Carmany on the release of information: "For God's sake -- don't you think I would tell anything/everything I knew if I could and end these merciless attacks on my integrity and motives, being called a liar, if I could?"

A readers tells Carmany: "It is not up to us to get an explanation from Linda Miles. That is your job. And considering she has given you an explanation, you owe it to the people who elected you to answer the questions about it and her response."

And an email: "If it's important and meaningful that no investigation has (thus far) resulted in charges against Wray, isn't it equally as important and meaningful that no investigation has (thus far) resulted in charges against Hinson? (And if not, why not?)"

Comments

[Bubba]

"And an email: "If it's important and meaningful that no investigation has (thus far) resulted in charges against Wray, isn't it equally as important and meaningful that no investigation has (thus far) resulted in charges against Hinson? (And if not, why not?)"

That's a completely seperate and distinct issue to the point at hand this week.

[The CA]

I don't think the question is whether Hinson broke any laws, but whether Wray was justified in investigating him. The overwhelming evidence supported an investigation at the very least.