ConvergeSouth has always included conversations about journalism and the internets, and that tradition will continue this year.
We've got someone good lined up to help lead the session, can't wait to tell you who it is.
« More faster now please | Main | Speed legislating »
May 27, 2007
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Comments
- Kim on 42 and done: Mike Krzyzewski’s depressing final act
- Billy Jones on Another list we don't want to be on
- Billy Jones on A list we don't want to be on
- Account Deleted on A list we don't want to be on
- Billy Jones on AI, robotics, and jobs in the N&R
- liv on Keep the damn tourney in Greensboro
- Ed Cone on Keep the damn tourney in Greensboro
- Ed Cone on Keep the damn tourney in Greensboro
- Jonathan Jones on Keep the damn tourney in Greensboro
- Billy Jones on Keep the damn tourney in Greensboro
Categories
- Amendment 1 (124)
- Broken Pipe (48)
- Business & Economy (1)
- Chasing Liddy (79)
- ConvergeSouth (176)
- DarkTimes (129)
- development (9)
- econ dev (14)
- Elm and Cornwallis (15)
- Fracking NC (86)
- Free the food trucks (34)
- GC GOP OMG (19)
- GoogleFi (96)
- Hagan interview (4)
- Hagan vs. Koch (18)
- Hotel bond fun! (74)
- Jonesborough (2)
- Library filters (33)
- Marshall and Burr (7)
- Marymandering (14)
- N&R (11)
- N&R columns (142)
- Online campaigns (7)
- Performance Art (36)
- protest petitions (37)
- Save the Haw River Park (46)
- SOPA/PIPA (19)
- Suing over satire (9)
- Trash Talk (71)
- Truth & Reconciliation (97)
- TWC: Tiers of a Clown (22)
- Wray fray (100)
converge south is a bunch of bullshit
Posted by: benholder | May 27, 2007 at 10:50 AM
Someone "good"??? How 'bout, "Someone great!" ??
Just in case anyone asks, here's the proactive answer: the N&R team that's always supported ConvergeSouth in prior years with talent and teamwork ASKED not to be included as discussion leaders this year. Some N&R folks thought that the sessions drew a little too much "Why does (or does not) the N&R do this?" and less about the discussion topics intended.
Posted by: Sue | May 27, 2007 at 12:03 PM
And we will still participate in whatever ways will help.
Posted by: John Robinson | May 27, 2007 at 12:06 PM