On Pearl Harbor day, Slate's Witold Rybczynski rates DC monuments in this slide-show essay.
I'm partial to the monument to Nathanael Greene at Guilford Courthouse National Military Park, and it seems to conform to Rybczynski's standards -- a powerful image, with enough information included to remind us why Greene mattered but not so much that it feels pedantic. There is something stirring in the archaic language on the plaque (scroll down to Photo 2 here), which I often read aloud to the dog when we walk by:
In the manoeuvering that preceded it, in the strategy that compelled it, in the heroism that signalized it, and in the results that flowed from it, the Battle of Guilford Court House is second to no battle fought on American soil...
I also like the praise from Cornwallis: "Greene is as dangerous as Washington. I never feel secure when encamped in his neighborhood."
I saw the the photographs in the N&R today of the Pearl Harbor attack and could only imagine what those soldiers went throught that day. My hats off to the ones who fought that day and are still living! They must all be in their 80's now and will not be around much longer.
Posted by: jc | Dec 07, 2005 at 02:56 PM
Ed, there are some surface similarities between your man Greene and Grant, but they are products of very different eras. In a talk I heard a few years ago, published here, Dennis Montagna puts some fascinating context onto the Grant memorial: By 1903 the country had had enough of peaceful-looking civil war soldiers. It was time to look warlike again.
Writes Montagna, "During the years that immediately followed the Civil War, many Americans had embraced a progressive doctrine, suggesting that as a culture reached a higher level of civilization, the barbarity of warfare would become anachronistic. They reasoned that the increasingly complex social organizations of production and commerce would lead to the dominance of the rational modern man who would be able to solve disputes peacefully. By the end of the century, however, a competing view challenged this optimistic one. Many worried that modern culture would become overcivilized. They feared that the disappearance of a warrior mentality would render the nation helpless to defend itself should that need arise, and that increasing cosmopolitanism would lead to national impotence. . . ."
The Slate photo-essay is interesting also for the way the author criticizes modern memorials for seeming like museum exhibitions. U. Va. professor Dell Upton has a theory: The contemporary U.S. is more pluralistic than it was during the days of a Greene or a Grant memorial. More voices have a chance of being heard. Consequently there is less control of the message, which leads to a stronger compulsion to control it. That, he believes, is "why contemporary monuments talk so much."
Posted by: Sally | Dec 07, 2005 at 09:10 PM
On second thought, though Greene and Grant were themselves of different eras--different wars and all that--the Greene statue is of the same era as the Grant. They both came out of an early 20th c. frenzy of monument-building. Grant's was part of a larger effort to reposition the memory of the Civil War, to put its heroes (military leaders and common soldiers) on par with the heroes of the Revolutionary War, part of a larger movement of national reconciliation. So despite the differences in their actual places in history, there is a kind of sameness to them. They're both symbols of American military pride and resolve. Catherine Bishir has written interestingly about this monumental era in North Carolina.
Posted by: Sally | Dec 08, 2005 at 07:57 AM
1975'ish I did a Boy Scout cleanup project around that monument... I always like stopping in there when I cut through town.
Powerful indeed.
Posted by: Mocklive | Dec 13, 2005 at 04:27 PM
In the manoeuvering that preceded it, in the strategy that compelled it, in the heroism that signalized it, and in the results that flowed from it, the Battle of Guilford Court House is second to no battle fought on American soil...
These line is very effective for me great posting for you.
Posted by: politics | Feb 21, 2010 at 10:09 PM
Mr. Washington is great man of USA your article topic is very Creative for USA people. Great posting for you.
Thank you
Posted by: Student aid | Feb 21, 2010 at 10:21 PM
Wonderful very nice posted your article thanks for shearing great knowledge.
thank you
Posted by: medical school | Feb 21, 2010 at 10:23 PM