GSO/Guilford Pols

October 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Shell game | Main | Gander sauce »

Feb 09, 2013

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cc33e53ef017d40e826f5970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference QCCWQ:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Roch

I don't know how the fat cats can accept that money in good conscience -- a food and beverage tax funneled to the wealthy? Unconscionable.

As someone suggested to me this morning, if the argument is that the team generates significant economic impact, tax the economic impact where it is discernible: vendors, tickets, licensing, merchandise, etc. not the poor slobs at the farthest conceivable end of the trickle who are buying life-sustaining necessities.

They have no shame.

Spag

Let them move. The sports stadium racket is the most blatant of the corporate welfare schemes.

pfknc

I am all for ending your government welfare benefits except for those I deserve and have paid for through job creation and wealth building. I guess the better question is who can I get to fund my lifestyle and add to my net worth - perhaps the taxpayers really want to see a sports stadium from a distance cause its likely most of those paying will never sit inside during an NFL game.

Andrew Brod

If the criterion for deserving corporate welfare is past job and wealth creation, then Charlotte qualifies. It's been a job-creating machine for years.

The comments to this entry are closed.