Is there a Libertarian wing of the NC Democratic Party?
If the uppercase L on "Libertarian" signals Libertopian, as it often does in the wild, then probably not.
If the question is, are there North Carolinians who vote Democratic and hold some libertarian principles, then, sure. On social issues, the Democrats trend more libertarian than the GOP.
Not sure this is the most pressing question facing the NCDP, but if you're rebuilding a brand it helps to cover all the angles, and there are places (e.g., gun laws) where this could be important.


Libertopians seem unwilling to accept the validity of the aggregated will of many individuals, expressed via democratic government, as legitimate. (At least as I understand things.)
Posted by: justcorbly | Feb 10, 2013 at 01:06 PM
@justcorbly
The will of the mob should be held in check least the mob may one day not be yours.
Posted by: polifrog | Feb 10, 2013 at 01:24 PM
Frog, that sounds like a rejection of the basic principle of democratic government.
In turn, libertarianism seems, to me, in its rejection of that principle, to be the recipe for the mobbish soup that nourishes the few who inevitably rise to dominate everyone else. After all, *that* has been the fate of most people throughout most of history.
Posted by: justcorbly | Feb 10, 2013 at 01:48 PM
Froggie, I'm sure all the LGBT folks in NC who want to get married would agree with you on that.
Posted by: Steve Harrison | Feb 10, 2013 at 02:00 PM
Yes, of course there are libertarian Democrats. There are also conservative Democrats, esp. in North Carolina and throughout the South. I'd be a lot more concerned with keeping them among the rank-and-file, than with gaining or retaining those with libertarian leanings. I guess you could call them DINOs. They're from the east, opposed Amendment One, aren't necessarily in the pro-Obama camp, and/or are registered Democrats because that's how their parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents voted.
"Rebuild" seems a little strong, to me. "Rebrand," maybe? When I think of the NCDP, I still think of folks like Jim Black, Mike Easley, Marc Basnight, John Edwards, Dumplin', Michael Decker, Jim Hunt, etc. - political dinosaurs and corruptocrats.
Who are the rising "stars" in the party and are they homegrown or recent transplants from New England who reside in Cary? Where is the new blood? I believe Roy Cooper and Richard Moore's time has passed and they're also symbolic of the old guard, which hopefully died the day Dumplin' left office.
Posted by: prell | Feb 10, 2013 at 02:06 PM
You're lumping Jim Hunt in with Jim Black and Mike Easley?
I think the NCDP, along with most NC Democrats, would be thrilled to find the next Jim Hunt.
Posted by: Andrew Brod | Feb 10, 2013 at 02:40 PM
But then, that is the point of our representative republic.
Posted by: polifrog | Feb 10, 2013 at 03:07 PM
"You're lumping Jim Hunt in with Jim Black and Mike Easley?"
I'm pretty confident that I did, AB, but it was in the context of "political dinosaurs and corruptocrats."
I'd say a 75 year-old man who spent his entire adult life in politics and is constantly rolled out as the standard-bearer of the NCDP qualifies as a political dinosaur.
Posted by: prell | Feb 10, 2013 at 03:33 PM
And my point was that the NCDP would love to have a few more like him.
Posted by: Andrew Brod | Feb 10, 2013 at 04:00 PM
Granted, Jim Hunt has a few miles on his tachometer. But he's impressed me more than once with his ability to focus on the relevant and articulate his message.
As far as him being "rolled out" by the Party, I have a feeling that's more his doing than anyone else. I get the distinct impression our former Governor isn't exactly thrilled with the way the Party has developed over the last few decades, and he's trying to use what influence he still has to fix our compass. Or is it sextant? Insert proper nautical navigational term.
Posted by: Steve Harrison | Feb 10, 2013 at 04:16 PM
>>"... that is the point of our representative republic."
It's a mechanical point. You can make direct democracy work only in a very small place. Say, an Athenian town square. (But, even, there, it didn't work for very long and it never worked for women, slaves, and foreigners.)
We have representative democracy because we need to implement an indirect democracy to cope with our size and our population. We do not have it because elected representatives are wiser beings who will lead us in the right direction. A good many of the Founders may have thought that, but it was hooey then and it's hooey now. If you fear a man because he's a member of the mob, why would you trust the same man when he manages to get himself elected to something?
Posted by: justcorbly | Feb 10, 2013 at 05:19 PM