Unofficial, but I put the crowd at yesterday's Romney/Ryan appearance in High Point at 473,192.

« Too much perspective | Main | GPD report »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cc33e53ef0177441acc12970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More than a few:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Unofficial, but I would put the readership of the usual liberal tripe on this blog at 6.
Posted by: sittinginthemiddle. | Aug 13, 2012 at 11:31 AM
As so often happens with these estimates, you may be erring on the high side.
Posted by: Ed Cone | Aug 13, 2012 at 11:54 AM
I guffawed.
Posted by: David Hoggard | Aug 13, 2012 at 12:24 PM
i think Ryan vs Hillary debates would be interesting.
Joe vs Ryan... well, the phrase "a battle of wits with an unarmed man" comes to mind.
Posted by: formerly gt | Aug 13, 2012 at 01:08 PM
It's amazing how one can find the time to visit a blog they hate, commenting on nothing, insulting folks who have little or no decision making power in government, and still be "productive" enough to consider themselves "victimized" by the same tax bracket as Mitt Romney.
We could all learn a thing or two about time management from sittinginthemiddle.
Posted by: Brandon | Aug 13, 2012 at 01:16 PM
Holy smack that is a large disparity between the GNR and HPE estimates, although the GNR does qualify their estimate of 10-15k by saying "only a limited few were allowed inside."
But the comments below the GNR story go straight to the heart of what people will be arguing about for the next 80 days or so.
It will be interesting to see if the two sides can stay on point over that duration in discussing critical policy details.
Personally, I'm not certain how anyone can with a straight face call for cutting the social safety net while cutting taxes for the most well to do Americans and increasing the Pentagon budget.
I guess these days if you are in those Ayn Randian "marginal tax rates" you have to look out for yourself and yourself alone. After all, they are John Galt.
Posted by: Account Deleted | Aug 13, 2012 at 01:43 PM
Since when is Sittinginthemiddle actually doing so? Fess up.
Posted by: Collards | Aug 13, 2012 at 03:36 PM
"We could all learn a thing or two about time management from sittinginthemiddle."- Brandon
Agreed, I might also be willing to teach a class about how to get through life without depending on someone else to handle your personal responsibilites and how to over come liberal hysteria.
Posted by: sittinginthemiddle. | Aug 13, 2012 at 06:22 PM
Like I said.......
Posted by: Collards | Aug 13, 2012 at 09:36 PM
Can you can teach me how to spell "overcome"?
Posted by: Brandon | Aug 13, 2012 at 10:57 PM
Regarding Ryan, life imitates art.
Posted by: David Wharton | Aug 14, 2012 at 09:48 AM
Over 15,000 to see Romney/Ryan. Around 600 to see Biden. {{{grin}}}
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfpzePp5y8s
Posted by: Tony Wilkins | Aug 14, 2012 at 02:22 PM
This is the Diamond Reo version I was looking for:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEwXcDViJTE
Posted by: Tony Wilkins | Aug 14, 2012 at 02:31 PM
So the N&R says 15,000 and the HPE says 2,700. Any other guesses?
Posted by: Thomas | Aug 14, 2012 at 03:44 PM
Don't ask me, I'm terrible at this game.
Posted by: Ed Cone | Aug 14, 2012 at 04:07 PM
"So the N&R says 15,000"
Did they really?
Posted by: Roch | Aug 14, 2012 at 04:16 PM
10,000 to 15,000.
Posted by: Thomas | Aug 14, 2012 at 04:32 PM
The Romney camp said it was the largest crowd they had spoken to in the country.
Posted by: Tony Wilkins | Aug 14, 2012 at 06:01 PM
"They drew an estimated crowd of 10,000 to 15,000 people in High Point, with only a limited number getting into the venue to hear the speeches." -- N&R
Thanks, Thomas. Ah, the good ol' passive voice in which a disembodied assertion is made unattached to anybody who might verify it or stand behind it.
Posted by: Roch | Aug 14, 2012 at 06:40 PM
The reporter tells me the 10,000 to 15,000 estimate came from "campaign sources." I've asked him if they are confidential.
Posted by: Roch | Aug 15, 2012 at 10:56 AM