GSO makes the short list (with Detroit, OKC, and Toledo) of cities with "biggest rises in income segregation in the decade."
Thnx to reader JB for the pointer.
Part of our occasional series, It's Rarely Good News When We're In the New York Times.

« Full investigation needed | Main | Hibachi Cafe »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cc33e53ef015436f6ecfe970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Two Americas:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
"Same as it ever was, same as it ever was..."
Posted by: Billy Jones | Nov 16, 2011 at 11:31 AM
Well, no. The point is that it's much more than it ever was.
Posted by: Andrew Brod | Nov 16, 2011 at 11:33 AM
"Well, no. The point is that it's much more than it ever was."
"And that's the way it was."
Posted by: Billy Jones | Nov 16, 2011 at 11:40 AM
A bit of good news from the same source, although glacially slow and still very lopsided, our neighborhoods have become less segregated over the past 30 years.
Posted by: Roch101 | Nov 16, 2011 at 12:29 PM
Sometime in the early seventies a coworker told me she needed to keep working because she and her huband couldn't afford their mortgage otherwise. In fact, wouldn't have qualified. The norm now, but still a bit unusual back then.
I remember saying something about there not being a three-income family. Crude, but accurate.
Posted by: justcorbly | Nov 16, 2011 at 12:57 PM
"Well, no. The point is that it's much more than it ever was."
"And that's the way it was."
So when's the Occupy New Irving Park protest going to take place?
Posted by: bubba | Nov 16, 2011 at 02:18 PM
Roch: "A bit of good news from the same source, although glacially slow and still very lopsided, our neighborhoods have become less segregated over the past 30 years."
Not my neighborhood.
Bubba: "So when's the Occupy New Irving Park protest going to take place?"
It's in the planning stages-- nothing is off the table.
Posted by: Billy Jones | Nov 16, 2011 at 03:11 PM
I have a suggestion: Occupy Bubba.
Posted by: Andrew Brod | Nov 16, 2011 at 03:18 PM
How does one occupy vacuous space, Brod?
Posted by: MojoNixon | Nov 16, 2011 at 03:25 PM
Bubba's been occupied for longer than we've known him.
Posted by: Billy Jones | Nov 16, 2011 at 03:28 PM
"How does one occupy vacuous space, Brod?"
Glad to see you asking for help, JoJo......but you're asking smeone who suffers from the same affliction you do.
Posted by: bubba | Nov 16, 2011 at 04:18 PM
One should first understand that there is no such thing as a vacuous space:
Therefore there is nothing to occupy that isn't already occupied.
Silly people.
Posted by: polifrog | Nov 16, 2011 at 05:31 PM
But I'd still be concerned about the safety of occupiers on the medians of Willoughby, esp. between St. Regis and Redford. Dog poop also is a concern.
Posted by: Ed Cone | Nov 16, 2011 at 05:46 PM
I took a look at the linked study, and Greensboro/High Point's measure of income segregation in 2007 was essentially at the national average (actually a tad below). So yeah, the trend is looking bad, but things aren't so bad here.
... yet.
Posted by: Andrew Brod | Nov 16, 2011 at 06:05 PM
Ed, "Dog poop also is a concern."
Dog poop means there are dogs. I've been to places here in the USA where people eat dogs. When stewed, Spot tastes like any other red meat.
Andrew Brod, ...yet.
Lest we forget that Guilford County has the highest foreclosure rate in North Carolina. Yet may be sooner than you/we think.
Posted by: Billy Jones | Nov 16, 2011 at 06:41 PM
PS. There's always West Cone Blvd.
Posted by: Billy Jones | Nov 16, 2011 at 06:42 PM
Channeling lost lines...
Posted by: polifrog | Nov 16, 2011 at 06:44 PM
Billy, it's important to understand what this study says and doesn't say. It doesn't say that people in the GSO/HP metro area were getting poorer as of 2007. It says that the variability of neighborhood income distributions across the GSO/HP metro area was increasing as of 2007.
Yeah, I know. But that's what it says. It's about the geographical distribution of income, not metro-wide level. Fewer poor people live near rich people, and vice versa.
Well, 2007 was four years ago, and your foreclosure observation is from right now. How has the Second Depression affected economic segregation since 2007? There are no stats yet to answer that, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if income segregation has actually fallen, precisely because of the drop in incomes. If more people are poorer, there might be less neighborhood-level variation.
Posted by: Andrew Brod | Nov 16, 2011 at 09:52 PM
And it's valid to bring up one of Roch's favorite caveats, which he might raise if he weren't busy yelling at conservatives over at Guarino's blog. The GSO/HP metro area includes Rockingham and Randolph counties in addition to Guilford. GSO and HP account for about half the population of the metro area. So this result is as much about the rural parts of the three-county region as it is about the two core cities.
Posted by: Andrew Brod | Nov 16, 2011 at 09:56 PM