UPDATE: Danny Thompson was kind enough to call with some details and perspective.
We're talking here about something like banded compensation, where people get paid within certain fixed ranges; the new plan is to add more of these bands, supposedly to be more competitive with other employers.
Thompson wonders why we're doing this now, when a compensation study already approved by Council (done by these folks) is due by June; why people are getting bumped into more remunerative bands in January, rather than at the beginning of the City's fiscal year; how the departments have the cash in their budgets to fund the increases, just months after discussions of service cuts ("that’s a little bit irritating"); and whether enough research was done on the subject, beyond a visit to this site.
And of course, raises covered by departmental budgets for the next six months would have to be built into future budgets.
Micromanaging departmental decisions on compensation is not the idea here, Thompson says. It's about the way budgets get made and spent.
Thompson says a pay freeze has been hard on City staffers, and would like to see a 2% salary increase next year for employees making less than $75K, or maybe $50K, as long as it does not involve a tax increase.
Raises are pretty scarce in my business, so I'm going to ask my boss to just move my salary range instead.
Not sure the City Council should be involved at the level of approving every $13 raise salary-range adjustment, but $150K is not nothing, and this is not a normal year.
Recent Comments