The Tea Party in historical context:
Ever since the 1930s, something very much like the tea party movement has fluoresced every time a Democrat wins the presidency, and the nature of the fluorescence always follows many of the same broad contours: a reverence for the Constitution, a supposedly spontaneous uprising of formerly nonpolitical middle-class activists, a preoccupation with socialism and the expanding tyranny of big government, a bitterness toward an underclass viewed as unwilling to work, and a weakness for outlandish conspiracy theories.
(Thnx to AB for the pointer.)
I made a similar point about the Clinton-era lunacy in this sadly-still-relevant column from last year.
Drum is right about the mainstreaming of the movement, and the power of the media, but I wouldn't undersell the anger over the economy, and also the unresolved passions stemming from 9/11.
Much of this anger is misdirected, channeled away from Wall Street and its lackeys by shouting millionaires in the pay of billionaires, but it's real nonetheless.
Recent Comments