March 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Agenda items | Main | Wimps »

Mar 23, 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Roch101

Are you under the impression that the complete application is forthcoming?

Ed Cone

No, the linked page says what is included and what is not.

Think I should amend the post to say "parts of" the response?

Roch101

Unless I am missing something, it looks like "none" of the response. The city should come through with what was promised:

"We will post a working draft on the GoogleGreensboro.com site the week of March 22nd as well."
Ed Cone

Not sure if you're objecting to the lack of the entire application, or to the as-yet-unfulfilled use of the future tense in the phrase "will post."

Roch101

The blog post I linked to above and the City's press release announcing the wiki to which you link in your post both promise to post a working draft. Where is the working draft?

Roch101

From the City press release:

"The City will also publish a draft of its Google project application today for residents to view and provide feedback. The draft will be available at http://googleforgreensboroapplication.wikispaces.com."

I asked if you had the impression that the entire application was forthcoming. You said no. I'm not asking you to read minds, but if what is currently posted is all we are going to get, wouldn't that be deficient to meet the promises made?

Ed Cone

The City says it "will post" a draft.

There's a page set up for it.

So far, so good.

If they don't end up populating the page with content, then they will not have met their promise.

But the future continues to arrive with every passing second, so let's give them a little time.

Roch101

Your new found confidence is contrary to your opinion of 10:17 that no more information was forthcoming. But if it thrills you to use your own change of mind to belittle someone else's concern, by all means.

Ed Cone

Roch,

I apologize for any lack of clarity.

I'm not trying to belittle anyone, and I have not changed my mind.

You asked earlier if I thought the complete application was forthcoming.

I said no, the page clearly states that only parts of the application are forthcoming.

What I have tried to say since then is that I do expect those parts to appear as promised.

Ed Cone

I hear the app team is adding its comments now, and that the parts of the document to be posted will follow.

Ross Myers

A working draft of the Narrative Parts of the Google Request for Information are up on the Wiki for input. The City has pledged to post a completed draft on the GoogleGreensboro site by Thursday.

Thank you to the GSO Public Library for helping pull the Wiki concept together.

Roch101

No worries, Ed. Posting the application the day before its due date falls short of what was originally promised to be several days prior.

The comments to this entry are closed.