N&O on the opening of the Civil Rights museum and GSO's "complex and seemingly inconsistent racial history."

« December 2009 | Main | February 2010 »
N&O on the opening of the Civil Rights museum and GSO's "complex and seemingly inconsistent racial history."
Jan 31, 2010 at 06:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 31, 2010 at 01:34 PM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
"City familiar with fostering lip-service on creativity."
There, fixed that for ya.
And:
"i felt a protectionist vibe rather than a sincerely wanting to work with others to help spread the good word about our downtown arts community vibe."
And:
Greensboro really does have a promising tech-oriented creative culture.It just doesn't have that much to do with the downtown groups that talk about such things.
Etc.
Jan 31, 2010 at 10:27 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
We need to face up to needed structural changes, and place them into law. To do less will simply mean ultimate failure — failure to accept responsibility for learning from the lessons of the past and anticipating the needs of the future.
I don't know whether Summers has repudiated those views — there has clearly not been any public statement from him saying, "I was wrong."
Jan 31, 2010 at 10:14 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
In my newspaper column, celebrating the Civil Rights museum and pondering the overdue demise of "the post-civil rights era, pre-civil rights museum ways" of racial politics.
You can read the whole thing after the jump.
Last year, one of my favorite columns: "The pole stars were Christ and Gandhi. Closer to home, Martin Luther King Jr. was showing how the strategy could work."
Jan 31, 2010 at 08:43 AM in Hotel bond fun!, N&R columns | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
Another bit of dull visual abstraction to plug another gap now before the report segues gracefully into a bit of human interest courtesy of some dowdy man opening letters in a kitchen and explaining how he's been affected by the issue.
Thanks to alert reader PLN (who notes, accurately, that this piece is not as good as Truth in Advertising, which I can remember being passed around via email back in the dark ages before the YouTubes changed our lives 4evah).
Previously: B-roll blues.
Special mention to Doonesbury, which used this technique for a graduation speech strip long, long ago.
Jan 30, 2010 at 02:54 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Eight days ago, I asked about the hotel deal, "Who vets that $12.5 million valuation on the property put up as equity?"
I'm still looking for an answer to that question.
People who know about downtown real estate keep telling me that $12.5 million looks like a whole lot of money for that property.
Mike Weaver says in the Rhino that the tax value of Elm Street Center is $5.5 million, adding, "I don't know of any properties that have sold for nearly three times tax value. They can pay more for the property than it is worth because it is not their money. It's other people's money."
The equity figure would seem important in setting Skip Alston's payday as a broker.
The deal includes $30 million from the bonds.
Subtract the $1 million the Kaplan group wants for its office building (which I'm told last sold for a few hundred thousand dollars -- this is not verified information see valuations here and discussion in comments below -- thnx to Roch and alert emailer J for info). Take out whatever portion of Chisholm's $2 million fee that she gets up front, and perhaps also Alston's fee, and whatever other costs are associated with this big project.
How much will it cost to actually build the hotel? If that number is less than $30 million minus non-construction costs, what happens to the rest of the bond money?
One other issue generating buzz: will the hotel get a sweetheart deal on parking spaces in the proposed city deck? That possibility is irritating other downtown business owners.
UPDATE: N&R recaps the news of the last ten days.
MORE: Biz Journal's Ivey says other projects face underwriting problems -- something that Chisholm seems to have worked out in advance.
Jan 30, 2010 at 12:43 PM in Hotel bond fun! | Permalink | Comments (50) | TrackBack (0)
My father introduced me to Holst's "The Planets" after hearing something in the Led Zeppelin song "Friends" (he had probably come upstairs to tell me to turn it down) that reminded him of that earlier work.
Anyway, this seems like fun.
Jan 30, 2010 at 11:52 AM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
[W]hen a venerable European central banker, a man whose very bearing connotes the old capitalist values, told me privately that he is now convinced that the financial system is too important to be left to the free market, I knew we were wandering into new territory.
Davos is different this year.
Jan 30, 2010 at 10:36 AM | Permalink | Comments (20) | TrackBack (0)
"North and south, as far as his eye could see, it was unbroken white..."
Our story today is To Build a Fire, by Jack London.
Jan 30, 2010 at 10:33 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Lisa Scheer took this pic on Mill Street about an hour ago.
Jan 29, 2010 at 10:16 PM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
"[R]are is the moment when a sitting president will visit—and take public questions—from members of the opposite party."
Slightly less rare now.
Jan 29, 2010 at 04:58 PM | Permalink | Comments (10) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 29, 2010 at 04:51 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 29, 2010 at 01:49 PM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 29, 2010 at 01:38 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
As long as we're having this mini-Velvetfest, a bit of history: "[T]he band's first ever live show was at a Summit High School dance."
Thnx to alert reader PLN for the pointer.
Jan 29, 2010 at 11:31 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 29, 2010 at 11:30 AM in Hotel bond fun! | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Consolation, of a sort: It's hard to sell a system that's already been bought.
Democrats and good-government advocates have been quick to warn of a flood of new corporate money entering American politics. But with campaigns already awash in corporate cash, some Democratic political pros doubt we'll notice much difference.
Jan 29, 2010 at 11:25 AM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 29, 2010 at 10:13 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Although few people now remember it, another wave of private securitizations once altered the real estate landscape...That wave ended pretty much like this one did.That fact should raise questions about whether the securitization machine should be patched up and back in business to operate without government guarantees.
Perhaps, instead, we should find a way to get banks and other long-term investors, like insurance companies, to make — and keep — most of the real estate loans that are needed in society.
Right, and consumers should live within their means. Crazy talk!
Jan 29, 2010 at 10:04 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Widely overlooked in the hotel hoopla (and obscured behind the Biz Journal paywall) is Steve Ivey's article about the bonds that would finance the project: "[I]nvestors are likely to have a healthy appetite for the tax-exempt notes," Ivey reports. Institutions assembling big bond portfolios will include some risky stuff in the mix.
If there's a market, there will be a seller. And that would seem to meet the state's threshold for approval.
So if the developers can find a way to finesse the HVS report -- another document too-much ignored amidst the noise -- it looks like we're going to get a new hotel downtown.
Bridget Chisholm knows how to work the system. She got her plan for a plan into the machine on deadline, outfoxing some smart local hoteliers in the process.
She partnered with local businessmen who will use bond money to goose an ailing investment and take cash out in the bargain. She gets paid. Skip Alston gets paid.
Who laughs last?
UPDATE: I forgot another masterstroke by Chisholm: she purchased local political clout by giving an equity stake in the as-yet-unbuilt project to a neighborhood group that represents a neighborhood in which the building will not be built. Will the Ole Asheboro group be able to take cash out of the deal, too?
Jan 29, 2010 at 09:45 AM in Hotel bond fun! | Permalink | Comments (11) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 29, 2010 at 08:56 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Somebody buy those boys an internet, I thought while reading today's tepid coverage of the hotel story in the Rhino.
More than three years ago, I wrote: "I understand Willy Hammer's flinty-eyed view of the web: the Rhino will make a serious move online when someone shows them the money."
Still true, and they have made some online upgrades since then, but as a news organization the Rhino is eating dust on this one.
And it's not just the blogs and the daily paper kicking up that trail, either -- Jordan Green of Yes! has demonstrated how the web lets a weekly lead the way on a developing story.
Jan 28, 2010 at 06:50 PM in Hotel bond fun! | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
Skip Alston apologizes to three City Council members for perceived threats.
But the bell cannot be unrung. His message has been delivered.
This is fascinating:Alston said he makes his living as a broker and feels he can't effectively represent clients if he can't speak to council members without worries of a conflict of interest.
"That really handicaps me as a developer," Alston said.
That's how its supposed to work, isn't it?
Your obligation as an elected official is to serve the people, not yourself, and that might come at some cost to you. If that cost is unacceptable, you should not be serving as an elected official.
Jan 28, 2010 at 05:26 PM in Hotel bond fun! | Permalink | Comments (14) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 28, 2010 at 03:18 PM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
"That depresses the hell out of me," my dad used to say, and when I finally figured out that he sounded like Holden Caulfield he said, "Where do you think I got it?," and I realized that my sensitive, phony-phobic father had been 18 when Catcher in the Rye came out, and it made me feel kind of tender and protective of him.
Don't worry, his favorite book was Catch-22.
Special thanks to Tex Wood, who taught his students much that was not on the curriculum, for introducing me to Seymour Glass.
Anyway, another obit.
Good for him, wanting to be left alone.
Jan 28, 2010 at 02:40 PM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Jordan has the Talking Points for White People requested for Deena Hayes.
Here's the rub: this is a math problem, not a racial issue.
Last time I checked, Randall Kaplan and George House were white. I'm a lot more interested in finding out how much cash they can pull out of this deal than I am in their skin tone.
Anybody who begrudges Alston and Hayes their economic interest in the hotel project on the basis of race is an asshole.
Objecting to Alston and Hayes playing the race card to obscure their economic interests in the project, and to Alston using his political muscle to advance a project for which he gets paid, is fair game.
Everyone understands that Quaintance and Weaver have an economic interest in this debate. Pointing that out is not racist, either, but it doesn't undermine their request for transparency.
As I've said before, I'd love to see a great new downtown hotel. Show me the numbers that justify this project, and I'm a cheerleader.
Black ownership? Great.
From my upcoming column: "[The issue of] economic justice for all people is very real, and one that became a major concern of Martin Luther King, Jr., as basic civil rights became law."
But: "Unfounded charges of racism are not just unfair, they give cover to racists and people who want to pretend for political reasons that race is no longer a factor in American life."
Jan 28, 2010 at 10:52 AM in Hotel bond fun! | Permalink | Comments (15) | TrackBack (0)
The City Council plans to reconsider Stratton Development’s rezoning request for the corner of North Elm and Cornwalls on Tuesday, February 2; the revised plan will include 14 townhouses.
Some key points from the neighborhood group's latest update:
*Rental homes may have been bought in anticipation of further rezoning along Elm and in the Wrenn/Newlyn neighborhood. There is concern that approval of this rezoning could lead to further spot rezoning.
*Neighbors are working on a Neighborhood Conservation Overlay (NCO) to prevent ad hoc zoning changes and guide future development. An NCO can give developers and residents confidence in the future.*Because protests petitions are in force, a three-quarters majority of voting council persons will be required to approve rezoning. Perkins cannot vote because of his interest in the property. Vaughan cannot vote because of her husband’s representation of the neighborhoods. With only seven Council people voting, two voting in the negative would defeat the project. If defeated, developers cannot ask for the same rezoning for one calendar year.
*The Council must reconsider the rezoning conditions which were defeated last December...It is not clear that Council can or will approve substituting the new conditions for the ones defeated in December.
Jan 28, 2010 at 09:51 AM in Elm and Cornwallis | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
"The consequence of reshaping society on a market model has been to make the state omnipresent."
A view from the UK with resonance on this side of the Atlantic (thnx to alert reader A for the pointer).
Jan 28, 2010 at 09:20 AM | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
Strong speech, strong delivery by Obama last night.
Democratic campaign ads should use footage of GOP reps sitting on their hands during the bank-bashing portion.
Calling out the Senate for excessive suckage: good.
This morning Elijah asked if Obama had changed one mind in that room. I said, no, but he wasn't really talking to them.
Jan 28, 2010 at 09:09 AM | Permalink | Comments (69) | TrackBack (0)
Doug Clark blasts Skip Alston, invoking Easley henchman Ruffin Poole as "a lesson of what can happen when a government official lets greed overtake his duty to give honest service to the public."
More:
The only recall that needs to occur here is for the other members of the board of commissioners to recall Alston as their chairman. They should be ashamed to leave him in that position.
Jordan Green reports that Deena Hayes is looking for white supporters in her battle with hoteliers and "the media."
Joe Killian reports from the bond authority meeting, where the board said, Show us the money, and the hotel developer's lawyer said, nah, you don't need to know the details, and hotel investor George House got irked at Mike Weaver. UPDATE: The print headline, "Bond authority wants to see letter of credit for hotel," overstates the news in the article itself; the online hed has been changed.
N&R also follows Jordan's scoop on Alston's alleged back-room tough talk, quoting Nancy Vaughan: "I think that they are strong-arming us to try to endorse a project that they are personally going to make money on."
Jan 28, 2010 at 08:52 AM in Hotel bond fun! | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
"Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. once said: 'I know he regards me as a dangerous reactionary,'" recalls the NYT obit for Howard Zinn.
His most famous work.
Boston Globe: "On his last day at BU, Dr. Zinn ended class 30 minutes early so he could join a picket line and urged the 500 students attending his lecture to come along. A hundred did."
A link to a parody I still find funny.
Jan 27, 2010 at 08:41 PM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 27, 2010 at 06:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I'm waiting for my man right now.
Well, I'm waiting on my son to get back from Harris Teeter with avocados so we can make guacamole. Does that count?
Jan 27, 2010 at 06:05 PM | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Louis Auchincloss, RIP.
I enjoyed his short story collection, Tales of Manhattan, and found evidence therein for the arguments advanced by both Vidal ("Auchincloss is the only one who tells us how our rulers behave in their banks and their boardrooms, their law offices and their clubs")and Kakutani ("his narrative lacks a necessary density and texture").
Jan 27, 2010 at 04:14 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 27, 2010 at 12:53 PM in Hotel bond fun! | Permalink | Comments (11) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 27, 2010 at 12:37 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I can remember the moon landing (just barely), the fall of the Berlin Wall, and 9/11, but I feel privileged to be alive for the moment to which all history up to this point has been leading.
"The press line is very long, and TV reporters are walking around trying to find anyone to comment. Excitement palpable." That does sound palpably exciting!
Jan 27, 2010 at 12:26 PM | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
Jan 27, 2010 at 11:59 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Oregon voters bucked decades of anti-tax and anti-Salem sentiment Tuesday, raising taxes on corporations and the wealthy to prevent further erosion of public schools and other state services.
Jan 27, 2010 at 10:05 AM | Permalink | Comments (30) | TrackBack (0)
So Basnight’s been President of a company for fifteen years – but he now says hasn’t had anything to do with it; and he told the press he resigned before the company bid on building the pier – but now it turns out his company got the contract months before he resigned.
Business as usual in Raleigh.
Jan 27, 2010 at 09:45 AM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
Soros says it's still too early for the Obama bank plan, but the plan itself does not go far enough in regulating financial markets.
More from Elizabeth Warren:
Bonus Davos coverage: Miserable bankers drown their sorrows in money.
Jan 27, 2010 at 09:17 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
"As elected officials, I would expect that Skip and Deena would appreciate the scrutiny that we have to give this."
Nancy Vaughan, master of the ironic jab, in Jordan Green's must-read Yes! Weekly article. That's some serious back-room strong-arming, there.
From my upcoming newspaper column, written after the protest march was canceled:
Alston took credit for defusing the situation, saying he knew it was about business, and that Quaintance and Weaver are stand-up guys on matters of race.
What really happened? Maybe Alston didn't want to mar the long-delayed opening of the museum. Maybe he just wanted to do the right thing. Maybe, as William Chafe, author of the book "Civilities and Civil Rights: Greensboro, North Carolina, and the Black Struggle for Freedom," said at the same Elon Law event where Romallus Murphy spoke about forgotten heroes, this is a town where the green of a dollar bill tends to trump black and white, and Alston, a successful businessman, recognizes that his own hard-earned place in the power structure gives him as much in common with the hoteliers as with Deena Hayes.
Jan 27, 2010 at 08:49 AM in Hotel bond fun! | Permalink | Comments (19) | TrackBack (0)
Previously in the awesomest video genre.
Jan 26, 2010 at 03:25 PM | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
A French parliamentary panel recommended on Tuesday moves to curb the wearing of Muslim veils in certain public facilities and suggested that lawmakers should pass a resolution condemning the garments.
The first part is okay with Mohammed Moussaoui, the head of a group of French Muslim organizations, but the second part is pretty hostile.
Elsewhere: "Danish prime minister, Lars Loekke Rasmussen, said last week that his government was also considering restricting the burqa and niqab. And in November, Swiss voters supported a referendum to ban the building of minarets on mosques."
Jan 26, 2010 at 02:04 PM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
I'm guessing there will be plenty of evaluation of how and why this process got so bungled and why on earth our commissioners and council didn't understand the process, didn't take the time to understand the process nor why they didn't pressure city staff to provide better information. I know, I know, plenty of blame to go around, but I would like to hear our council own up to their part rather than just pointing fingers at staff.
To be fair, Linda Shaw has said she and her follow commissioners bear responsibility. On the other hand, Mike Weaver says staff really screwed up, and a smart lawyer told me that city and county attorneys should have been crystal clear on the issues before they were discussed.
But GO has a point.
Jan 26, 2010 at 01:47 PM in Hotel bond fun! | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
Spending freeze more like a mild chill:
The spending freeze would affect only about one-eighth of the nation's $3.5 trillion budget, the bulk of which is devoted to entitlement programs...It would not restrain funding for the $787 billion economic stimulus package [...] nor would it apply to a new bill aimed at creating jobs...It is also unlikely to affect the approximately $900 billion health-care bill."
Other than that, brrr.
Jan 26, 2010 at 01:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Dave Ribar and Jon Stewart take issue with South Carolina Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer, who compared providing school-kids with free lunch to feeding stray animals.
"You're facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply. They will reproduce," said Bauer, a candidate for the GOP gubernatorial nomination.
Stewart: "Oh, South Carolina, you just keep on giving, don't you?"
Jan 26, 2010 at 12:36 PM | Permalink | Comments (13) | TrackBack (0)
How bad is the CRE crash?
Wilbur Ross is buying.
Jan 26, 2010 at 10:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
[T]he recent Supreme Court decision gives foreigners basically an unfettered right to spend money on US elections -- China, the UK, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Russia, take your pick. The majority tried to paper over this. But now foreign corporations, foreign individuals and even foreign governments can use corporations as pass-throughs to spend millions or tens of millions of dollars supporting their candidate of choice in a US election.
And it appeared pretty bad in the first place:
Jan 26, 2010 at 09:50 AM | Permalink | Comments (42) | TrackBack (0)

Recent Comments