GSO/Guilford Pols

September 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

« Don't let them steal it | Main | Sultans of Swat »

Jan 26, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cc33e53ef010536ee6896970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No nukes?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

RBM

I have a limited sense of humor, but this was funny:

The German non-nuclear model sounds appealing.

It also sounds appealing to me to be independently wealthy !!

Down to the nuts and bolts, 'bungled construction' - again, still.

Money, make somebody take the risk, and pay for it, if the builders think they can get away with it.

Dream on. The future will be a net energy consumption DECREASE.

Oh, here's a proponent.

Fec

Finland produces great architects, I think, but not much else.

The rating agencies must be forgiven for being a bit gun shy just now.

I hoped for three plant framework designs. Complaining about where to put the re-bar seems like a cop out.

This story has Joel Leonard, the Maintenance Evangelist, and eponymous denizen of Fincastles, written all over it.

The last time I checked, the Navy built a pretty good nuclear plant.

Seriously, the French still haven't figured out what to do with their waste.

Fec

RBM, that's a great link. I particularly like the molten salt reactor.

Hat tip to you for my the waste link.

The comments to this entry are closed.