I posted this comment in a thread on Rick Warren and the inauguration:
The dialog between Etheridge and Warren is important.
She knows that gay people historically have been ostracized, demonized, and even physically endangered, and that religion has often been used to justify such behavior. She perceives opposition to gay marriage as a continuation of that mindset.
He knows that his beliefs lead him to oppose gay marriage, and inclusion of gays in his church.
But they don't know each other, and so they are free to impose upon each other any stereotype that seems to fit.
Now they've met. She can feel some decency in the man. He can see that she is very much a part of the message of love he believes. They may not end up agreeing on the presenting issue, but their chances for mutual respect and agreement in some areas increases, even as both are criticized for coming together.
Ideally, the speakers at an inauguration bring us all to the same place, even those who would be happy to see no religious element to the ceremony, and give us a safe place to put our differences, at least for a moment.
There are many places on earth where no grievance is ever forgotten, and people are invested in keeping conflicts going. If one is more interested in seeking grievance than finding common ground, one can always find reasons to perpetuate discord.
One good thing about living in Greensboro is that it affords those who would seek it the chance to know many different types of people. I count among my friends many who hold very different views on any number of issues. That doesn't make us agree, but it makes us more agreeable.
Obviously knowing each other is no panacea. But it can be a start. Life outside the silo is healthy. Good for Etheridge and Warren for seeking it, and good for Obama for trying to broaden the common ground.
Peace. Merry Christmas.
Recent Comments