Brooks on HillaryCare II: "Hillary Clinton's health care plan is a huge step forward from 1993. It's better than the G.O.P. candidates' plans (which don’t exist)."
Some analysis and lots of links here.

« Free for all | Main | Weather reports for 10-K? »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cc33e53ef00e54ee00c1a8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference HillaryCare:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
"Hillary Clinton's health care plan is a huge step forward from 1993. It's better than the G.O.P. candidates' plans (which don’t exist)."
Really?
Brooks needs to pay better attention, because what's suggested here is not new. But it is a solution, and it's FAR better than what Hillary, Obama, and Edwards want to do.
Key points:
"In short, the best health reform proposals will be those that recognize and build on the virtues of our market-based medical system. Sick people around the world come here because they can't get quality care in their home countries. Many health-care professionals come here to practice, leaving behind well-meaning health-care systems where government is in charge, bureaucrats make the decisions, and where the patient doesn't have the choice he or she does in the U.S.
Mrs. Clinton may think Americans want to trade freedom and innovation for the illusory security of government regulation and surrender control of their health decisions to government bureaucrats. My bet is 2008 will teach us something different if Republicans make health care a centerpiece issue."
Indeed.
Posted by: Bubba | Sep 18, 2007 at 08:22 AM