Blogads



  • blog advertising is good for you


GSO/Guilford Pols

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« News you can use | Main | Property rights »

Aug 01, 2007

Headline of Rolling Stone article: "Ethanol Scam: Ethanol Hurts the Environment And Is One of America's Biggest Political Boondoggles."

I hate it when they beat around the bush like that.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cc33e53ef00e39820875e8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Teaser:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Glad to see this coming more to the forefront. I've had big hesitations about Ethanol for awhile now for a lot of these reasons. But now it seems nearly as entrenched as the oil industry.

The article does not even mention that the US Govt. slaps a $.50 a gallon tax on imported ethanol. Brazil is way out in front of the U.S. in this technology and generates the majority of its fuel from the much more efficient sugar cane plant. The downside of course is the destruction of the rain forest in order to grow the sugar cane.

I'm convinced that ethanol is not the answer to the quest for the best alternative fuel.

For the moment, biodiesel seems to be the best alternative, at least until better technology solves electric batteries' major drawbacks for vehicle use.

Brazil's experience is not instructive for the US. 1 in 7 Brazilians owns a car. They have been able to make ethanol work for them by ripping up the rain forest and the fact that for most of their population, this is not an issue.

Biodiesel has its own problems, which primarily come with substituting land for food in the US to land to grow fuel, and again, scalability. A single barrel of oil is 400 years of buried sunshine that takes comparatively little energy to get out of the ground.

Oil dependence is not going to be solved on the supply side, but on the demand side. Ideally, we would lead with policies to make this so, and yes, that would include raising fuel economy standards and taxes on fuel.

There may be no silver bullets. Seems like a combination of approaches makes sense -- conservation (lots of easy steps there before we even get serious), more rational ethanol policy (including curbing our sugar lobby; also, sugarcane grows in places other than Brazil), better extraction from shale, alt fuel research, etc.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment