Blogads



  • blog advertising is good for you


GSO/Guilford Pols

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Comments, again | Main | Shrinkage »

Aug 08, 2007

Leonhardt:

No one really knows whether preventive medicine will save money in the long run, let alone free up the billions of dollars a year needed to help pay for universal health insurance. In fact, studies have shown that preventive care — be it cancer screening, smoking cessation or plain old checkups  —  usually ends up costing money. It makes people healthier, but it's not free...

...by describing it as an easy win-win solution, the presidential candidates are gliding over an important part of the issue. Preventive care saves real money only when it replaces existing care that is expensive and doesn’t do much, if any, good. There are plenty of examples of such care...persuading [people] that basic care is sometimes cheaper and better — will be difficult.

More: "I realize many people will react to the notion that preventive care usually costs money by saying, 'So what? We should do it anyway.' And we should."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cc33e53ef00e393380a8e8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No free lunch:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment