A letter to the N&R about Allen Johnson's coverage of the TRC says, "a majority of the City Council decided after reviewing the report not to proceed with further public discussion."

Really? Did this actually happen? Tom Phillips says in the comments beneath Allen's post, "I read the executive summary which I felt was very biased and I saw no need to read any further." I know a lot of Councilmembers promised to read it, but did a majority actually do so?

"Review" is a pretty vague term, but I don't think the LTE is accurate -- seems to me that a majority of the City Council decided not to proceed with further public discussion long before the report was published.