Really? Did this actually happen? Tom Phillips says in the comments beneath Allen's post, "I read the executive summary which I felt was very biased and I saw no need to read any further." I know a lot of Councilmembers promised to read it, but did a majority actually do so?
"Review" is a pretty vague term, but I don't think the LTE is accurate -- seems to me that a majority of the City Council decided not to proceed with further public discussion long before the report was published.