Doctors don't want to die any more than anyone else does. But they usually have talked about the limits of modern medicine with their families. They want to make sure that, when the time comes, no heroic measures are taken.
This article made me think of my dad, an MD who chose to pursue pretty much every medical option available to him at the time when he got what he knew to be a death-sentence cancer diagnosis, in part because he felt an obligation to do so as an oncologist himself. And as is increasingly clear to me as I close in on the age at which he received the bad news, he really, really was not ready to die.
The Journal piece reminded me of this article by Atul Gawande:
Curiously, hospice care seemed to extend survival for some patients...
...people who had substantive discussions with their doctor about their end-of-life preferences were far more likely to die at peace and in control of their situation, and to spare their family anguish.
My father knew the score, and he was very clear with us along the way. I don't want to pretend it made things easy for anyone, but it did make things better than they might have been otherwise.
We already have $134,108,500 in approved (2008) bond projects that are still outstanding, which were slated to be completed "in 5 to 7 years". Four years later, the majority of big projects have not yet reached the design phase, and none of them has been completed. In fact, as I understand it, most of the bonds for these projects have not yet been sold. Many neighborhoods have been waiting patiently for the improvements that the public approved in 2008.
I would like to know by what process the council schedules the sale of these bonds, and whether the current mayor and council intend the proposed PAC and economic development bonds to cut into the queue ahead of these projects.